Appropriate render settings for High Resolution (4096x4096)

[Kadri]

You should see my Hard disk with project names. I have a very scientific seemingly approach(not) .
Some of them have names on the end like  "last" , "final" , "really last" , "last02"  etc.  
Node names are more on the nightmares side

[cdrose]

You should see my Hard disk with project names. I have a very scientific seemingly approach(not) .
Some of them have names on the end like "last","final""really last","last02" etc. 
Node names are more on the nightmares side

Haha awesome! I'm a default kind of person "Untitled_0019" lol 

Yea it's easily done when working on something for so long you get into a flow of knowing where to click and what to look at and can accidentally over look things 

[rcallicotte]

Another thing to look for and try would be the nebula someone created here - really adds to the realism of a space scene.

[Matt]

Cloud samples tells us nothing without knowing the detail level it results in.
128 cloud samples can be detail 3 or detail 0.3, depening on cloud depth and density.
At such big resolutions see if a detail level of 0.5 gives you satisfactory results.
If the noise is too high increase with 0.1 increments.

You mean quality?

Matt

[Tangled-Universe]

Yes, quality it's called in the cloudnode, not detail. Just semantics, I don't think it made my point completely useless because of that mix up 

[Matt]

Sorry about that, I'm just trying to make sure that people don't confuse cloud quality with the detail setting on the render node. What you said about samples and quality is good advice.

Matt