Populations test

Started by DannyG, December 17, 2012, 07:01:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

DannyG

NWDA Lilac, Grasses, reeds, weeds, Spruce, hero rock, Silva3D BlackberryVar3, Pines, Mandrakes Bushes.

First render was at .8 AA10
New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media: facebook|Twitter|Instagram

DannyG

#1
Some needed advise from Tangled Universe his recommend settings. Big difference I think, grass is much softer. Bit of a softening to the scene as a whole but still looks good. thanks Martin (Not a huge difference in render time compared to the straight 10)
Detail .8, AA16 (1/16) pixel noise .02 Cubic B-Spline
New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media: facebook|Twitter|Instagram

masonspappy

it looks very good  Danny.

Dune

Nice setup and I like the veggies. The stones might need some improvement, IMHO. But the main difference I see between the two renders is that the latter is a bit blurred overall. I think if you prefer that, it's quite easy to blur a little in photoshop, but render crisp, so you have the detail. Or do I miss something?

DannyG

Hello Dune, you are correct it is a bit blurry/softened as you mentioned what I didn't like about the original render is the grass looks a bit raspy or harsh. Thats very high res grass I was a bit confused as to why it was looking like that, (maybe some intersecting going on)  Martin suggested that I use the above render settings to help this and it did indeed help the grass but it did add some blur to the scene as a whole, I think by using a xero filter or something like that in PH would work, but would seriously the impact the clarity of the atm and trees (more so than above) I appreciate the look and advise, and yes the displacements do look a bit pointy, need to sort that out as well. working on it  ^^
New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media: facebook|Twitter|Instagram

Henry Blewer

The Box pixel filter works well also with Martin's settings.

I like both renders actually. Have you tried DOF for your renders? I have not been able to really get that to work...
http://flickr.com/photos/njeneb/
Forget Tuesday; It's just Monday spelled with a T

Dune

How about the Mitchel-Netravali filter? I use that a lot.

Zairyn Arsyn

very nice scene.
interesting rock displacements.
WARNING! WIZARDS! DO NOT PREDICT THE BEHAVIOR OF OTTERS UNLESS YOU OBEY BIG HAPPY TOES.

i7 2600k 3.4GHZ|G.skill 16GB 1600MHZ|Asus P8P67 EVO|Evga 770GTX 4GB|SB X-FI|Antec 750W
http://zlain81.deviantart.com/

inkydigit

Great stuff Danny and some really useful info too...Dune's suggestion sounds interesting too!
J
:)

DannyG

Mitchel Netravali Render setting Detail .8 AA16
New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media: facebook|Twitter|Instagram

Dune

I like this better than the very soft one. How about a little population variation among the grass(es)? And I would change the stones/dirt. Smoother, more color variation.

TheBadger

Good set up. Now drive your self mad tweaking it to perfection.  ;D
It has been eaten.

DannyG

Thanks for the help gentleman, I will work on this this weekend. Sort out the issues Dune mentioned. Thanks again
New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media: facebook|Twitter|Instagram

Aerometrex

Very impressive result.  How long did it take to process?
I am passionate  about the art and science of digital aerial mapping, photogrammetry, geospatial information, VR and 3D modelling.
http://aero3dpro.com

choronr

Danny, I would suggest you give the stones/rock a more of an earth color (brown/gray). This would better blend with your grasses and plants.