Wreck Waterfall

Started by Kadri, December 23, 2012, 06:02:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

TheBadger

I like the second image, my self. But the 3rd image with the fly by added makes the OP better too. Grand image Kadri!
It has been eaten.


Jo Kariboo

Nice series. I prefer the version 2.

Kadri


Thanks, Jo!

I am rendering an animation now.
The settings are more from the first one.
Maybe the second would be better but i did not made the spaceship for such a scene.
So a little darker setting is more suited .

I had 80 frames or so rendered but did not liked some parts.
So i changed some settings. It will take 15-20 days probably .
One frame takes nearly 40 minutes ( i7 2600K + affinity set to 7 cores).
Too long for an 1280x538 animation.
But lower settings does have too much noise-flicker.

Mor

This is a great looking image! I prefer the 3rd one. The clouds are great looking and the fly by is a great addition to the scene. Looking forward to see the animated version  8)

Simius Strabus

Looking forward to seeing your animation.
Why stop dreaming when you wake up?

iMac i7 2.8GHz 8Gb

Kadri

#22

Thanks guys!

As expected the noise was too much so i changed the AA to 6 . There is still noise.
One frame takes a little more then 1  hour on my i7 2600K.
On our old Quad (6600 i think) it takes more then 3 hours for one frame.
It is more a test now.
I search everything about animation here in the forum .
Noiseless animation with low render times is not so easy.
I am conquering my wife's pc right now
and will converting the 10 years old good XP (the hardware is not so old ) to Windows 8 64 bit ,
especially to use it for this animation as a third pc.