^^ I agree and I disagree. I don't think the subject is unworthy, I just think it is a very literal representation of the subject with not much time spent on Esthetics. And by Esthetics I don't mean just if something looks good or not. I mean Style, interpretation, statement and so on.
I find Yossam's images in general to be very straight forward and honest. (Which is not to say others are dishonest or something). Just simple natural landscapes. Something someone in my life is always telling me I should focus on.
Not arguing with Markal here. Just trying to participate in a broader discussion. I do agree that the image is unexciting, but thats what I think the value of it is. The second some wind is added (or the sense of a breeze), or a cinematic lens effect or anything like that, it would become an entirely different image. Personally. Im rather exhausted from exciting things. Thats what I focus on, thats whats in the movies and on TV and in the news. Thats why that someone I mentiond wants me to fucus on simpler things. But who can change?
In general I always hope to find more series when I look in the forums here. So where you start out with an image, get it great, and then go in and change the images feeling/emotion/idea, but not change whats in the render.
So take Yossam's image, and the next one its the same scene, but a storm is coming. Or its the same scene, but 20 years later and everything is dead... But then its not a simple landscape anymore.