depression

Started by Dune, September 06, 2015, 10:42:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Oshyan

PNG does have an alpha channel (or at least the capability to have one). Your most recent image looks quite good to me...

- Oshyan

bobbystahr

Quote from: Oshyan on September 10, 2015, 03:17:38 PM
PNG does have an alpha channel (or at least the capability to have one). Your most recent image looks quite good to me...

- Oshyan

You can actually create one in irfanview when saving .png It prompts to select the transparent colour. I've used it a bit.
something borrowed,
something Blue.
Ring out the Old.
Bring in the New
Bobby Stahr, Paracosmologist

masonspappy

Quote from: Dune on September 10, 2015, 02:57:13 AM
I make my own textures (gathering branches and photographing them in front of a white board),

First, the image seems fine. Interestingly , I use a black background for the same purpose

Dune

In Photoshop I don't see an alpha layer in the png's I made, so I still wonder why I need to tick that box in TG for it to work.
Or whether it's wise to make the alpha layer. In the latter case, the file is just as big as the tif, so I might as well stick to that. Not really important, though, it works.

Here's my setup (I just had this white board). Never mind the title, it's not a birch branch.

Matt

Quote from: Dune on September 11, 2015, 03:10:18 AM
In Photoshop I don't see an alpha layer in the png's I made, so I still wonder why I need to tick that box in TG for it to work.

The "use alpha" checkbox affects how it interprets the file you put into the opacity slot (whether to use the RGB as opacity or the alpha channel as opacity). Is that where your PNG is?

Matt
Just because milk is white doesn't mean that clouds are made of milk.

Dune

Yes, it is. See screendumps. But in PS there's only the RGB layers, no alpha. And I would have expected the transparent PNG in the color tab to be sufficient, but it's not apparently.

Matt

There must be an alpha channel in that image, otherwise you wouldn't be able to get a clean edge from just the RGB information that I can see in the screenshot (or maybe you could, but it would be inverted anyway). So, whatever Photoshop is telling you isn't the whole story.

Matt
Just because milk is white doesn't mean that clouds are made of milk.

Matt

TG's image preview also says it's only RGB, but it must be getting that matte from somewhere.

Matt
Just because milk is white doesn't mean that clouds are made of milk.

bobbystahr

#23
Have you had a look at it in Irfanview...sometimes it will show stuff PS won't but this is most curious.
something borrowed,
something Blue.
Ring out the Old.
Bring in the New
Bobby Stahr, Paracosmologist

Dune

I'll check it out, or zip the file for you to scrutinize.

bobbystahr

Quote from: Dune on September 12, 2015, 11:16:30 AM
I'll check it out, or zip the file for you to scrutinize.
feel free...I have time....lots of time, heh heh heh
something borrowed,
something Blue.
Ring out the Old.
Bring in the New
Bobby Stahr, Paracosmologist

Dune

In the meantime... lessened the number of leaves on the juniperus, so they get more light inside.

bla bla 2

Quote from: Dune on September 12, 2015, 03:32:21 AM
Yes, it is. See screendumps. But in PS there's only the RGB layers, no alpha. And I would have expected the transparent PNG in the color tab to be sufficient, but it's not apparently.

Great.  :D

AP

I certainly see a visual improvement concerning how the light interacts with the vegetation.

bobbystahr

Quote from: Dune on September 13, 2015, 03:58:52 AM
In the meantime... lessened the number of leaves on the juniperus, so they get more light inside.

smart idea...looking really good Ulco.
something borrowed,
something Blue.
Ring out the Old.
Bring in the New
Bobby Stahr, Paracosmologist