Quote from: jwiede on August 11, 2019, 05:58:17 PMUgh, editor ate quotes and mangled reply, need to try again from start, sorry. What's up with the post editor?
Uhh I'm not sure why the quoted message has nothing to do with the message I quoted. You may have edited it when I hit quote...
Quote from: undefinedHowever, it would serve as a strong reference base from which it would be much easier to derive actual reference documentation. It could even significantly reduce the need for word-by-word review by Matt, because the more experienced users would be in a position to peer-review entries (which may not be as in-depth value, but still brings significant value nonetheless -- not every issue is a low-level complex nightmare, after all).
Yeah, I think that was the original initiative behind the Wiki, and us being able to edit, so information can be as accurate as possible. I think the problem there was the system in place. I needed better spam prevention measures. In general though, considering we're not Wikipedia with however many millions of users, let alone editors, we probably should limited access to the wiki if it gets sorted. Though I think
@Oshyan mentioned allowing access to people now if they want.
