Hmmm. Still not sure if I'm describing it right. I'm not talking about Global Illumination or ambient light, or something that is scattered into shadowed areas. I use the leaves example because its one that is common and it is one of the only landscape uses for such a function. If you look at a backlit tree in the real world, you can see the sun hitting the leaves even though the side that the light is hitting is facing away from you. I'm guessing the guy who mentioned transparency has the right idea, just the wrong way to do it. Just in the real world, the leaf isn't transparent, its just so thin, you can see the light through it, as well. Just like if you hold up a sheet of paper to the sun and put your hand behind it, you'll see the shadow on the paper, even though both the light source and hand are hidden from your eye (the camera). The paper is only lit from one side, but both sides are lit. Apply this theory to a tree, and some leaves will be half lit, half shadowed, even though the light source is behind, the leaves will still be lit, etc. The same would be true of grass. I'm hoping Matt will read this, if he's the stickler for realism that I think he is.
Anyway, thanks for the suggestions, I'll keep trying a couple of things until I get it right, then.