Planetside Software Forums

General => Image Sharing => Topic started by: TheBadger on July 14, 2013, 01:33:40 AM

Title: Back to basics
Post by: TheBadger on July 14, 2013, 01:33:40 AM
T-U made me look in my old T2 folder. Found this. Did some work tonight on it.
Let me know if you think if it has any value for a portfolio.

Thanks
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: Dune on July 14, 2013, 02:26:18 AM
"No", he said bluntly, and disappeared through the side door, leaving the audience gasping in hardly controlled rage. Only one man stood up and raised his voice...

;)

What is it; is everybody pulling up old stuff? We want NEW renders!
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: TheBadger on July 14, 2013, 09:24:27 AM
I just find that Im too harsh on my self. If I have ever given someone here negative feed back, believe me, its nothing compared to what I tell my self.
With that in mind I thought I should let someone else who is impartial to the image, have a say. Because otherwise I will never put anything in my portfolio.

The image is meant to be a matt background for something else I have been toying with.

Quote;)
So yes?
I could use some criticism that makes sense here guys  :-[
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: Dune on July 14, 2013, 12:02:32 PM
I think the clouds are too 'busy' and the displacements (right area) look like the are crossing themselves, so to speak. Too much redirection, I'd say. But for a far backdrop.... maybe. But I think you can do much better, Michael!
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: Saurav on July 15, 2013, 02:47:15 AM
I agree with Ulco.
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: TheBadger on July 15, 2013, 03:18:59 AM
Alright.
I never felt very strongly towards this one. There are some things I liked and could not pull out from the things I did not like. Had to make sure though, did not want to throw it away if it had any value.
I am glad I can let it die now.

Cheers.
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: Upon Infinity on July 15, 2013, 02:52:56 PM
I'll be honest.  I don't like it, and I'll tell you why.  Mountain shapes seems a little off.  As does the composition of the frame.  There is no context in the image.  The best part about the image, however, are whatever colour you're using for your atmosphere, and the clouds in the background are pretty neat.
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: bla bla 2 on July 15, 2013, 03:11:50 PM
La base des nuages me paraît trop plat, c'est possible plus volumétrique ?

The cloud base seems to me too flat, it's possible more volumetric ?

(google translate)  ;D
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: Simius Strabus on July 15, 2013, 03:31:14 PM
I kinda like it. Maybe create a black and white version.
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: TheBadger on July 16, 2013, 02:12:43 AM
Any better?
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: efflux on July 16, 2013, 05:49:22 PM
The Black and white one probably does look a lot better. You chose an ambitous scene which is good. I agree with the others about the clouds and the displacement mess ups but the rock surface is good.
Title: Re: Back to basics
Post by: Simius Strabus on July 16, 2013, 06:01:45 PM
Love it!