vegetations: walli, aymenk 2003 et Xfrog
Looks nice!
Not sure but the objects do look like they could use a little more detail and-or AA ?
Quote from: Kadri on November 16, 2013, 09:12:18 PM
Looks nice!
Not sure but the objects do look like they could use a little more detail and-or AA ?
Thank you Kadri !
Actually it .8 detail and 7 AA
Interesting. Which pixel filter do you use ?
Quote from: Kadri on November 16, 2013, 09:23:19 PM
Interesting. Which pixel filter do you use ?
narrow cubic
Thanks.If you are satisfied there is nothing much to say more :)
Nice terrain. I like the way the outcrop is framed. Some of those small plants may be in trouble if
there is a sand storm.
Thank you for your comments, ok I'll try to improve it! :)
I like it ;)
Nice composition and colors.
Sympas. :)
I always like the way you get a nice composition together, and you get these very bright scenes. I like this as well, it has a very pleasant atmosphere (especially if I look out my window now.. dull and gray).
I do have a few comments (as you want to improve); why not dump the front trees? I think it's stronger without them. Or replace them with a very bleached dead trunk or branch (not too obtrusive). And the two sets of shrub above eachother right behind that could be slightly different placed, IMHO.
You might want to try the Mitchel Netravali filter, and go for soft shadows!
Very nice. i like the lights and composition.
Just one thing, I would have removed the bushes on the top of the rock.
I think they don't have the soil there to grow up, it is just rock.
Anything else is great.
Maybe push the detail level up to 1. I can see faceting on the rocks. I often get this too when subdivision isn't high enough. Like the exposure levels. Looks photographically correct.
Very good one going here Jo; and, some good advice for improvement. Regarding the tree at the right side, I would consider Walli's Bristlecone Pine model; but only showing about 1/2 of it and close up.