I'm sorry, you are of course correct - I had misinterpreted what you originally wrote and I apologise unreservedly for that. However, I also think that you've misinterpreted what I wrote above - I really don't feel that it's my right to interfere with Planetside's internal business structure or dictate what they should be doing. I have every confidence in the company's competence and they have given me no reason to think otherwise.
As I expressly stated above, I'm not personally interested in the specific answer to C-A's question, I just think that if I, you, C-A, or frankly anyone, wants to know what sort of company they should have the right to ask. The actual question was so high level that I don't honestly see what the problem is - no-one asked for full disclosure of company records, or Director's details or any such thing. The question was merely what sort of company Planetside is, which I think is a perfectly legitimate one to ask, if only out of interest. (Even if the question isn't relevant, it is still legitimate; and in any case it is Planetside's place to state how relevant it is by giving an answer or refusing to do so.)
All of the rest of my post above was merely clarification of the legal detail, and was therefore somewhat extraneous to the argument I've again put forward in the paragraph imediately above this one.
Inscrutable