You hit the nail on the head Hannes!
And thats what happens when you let modernism and post modernism decide what reality is. Its whatever anyone says it is.
So science, economics, history and everything else all loose all meaning. They become whatever you want them to be. They mean whatever you
feel like. Or whatever the majority, or whoever has power says.
And in the end it all becomes about taste. Personal taste. Everything comes down to if you prefer vanilla ice cream or chocolate. Do you prefer socialism or capitalism? Whats the difference then?
The problem is that reality does not care how we feel about it. And feeling bad about it does not change it. Which is why the reality for most humans is misery then death.
And we don't even have art anymore to record it since the post modernists and the modernists all agree, there is no such thing as history. And if you don't believe me, just turn on the news and try to find the truth.
QuoteWhen u observe something and it communicates to you in a nice way..etc then it is art for you. Otherwise if that thing like the margarine on the chair was not an art for u as it communicated nothing for u. You were not able to understand that thing...if there is no communication then there is no understanding. Therefore I think your teacher was right.
You just proved Hannes' point!
So the problem in your argument is not that the thing was not art, but that hannes is just stupid. This is how modernism works. Modernism is rule by the "genius".
Add a "will to power" and you have post modernism, you will also have hitler.
