Started by RichTwo, August 21, 2019, 11:49:18 am
Quote from: WAS on August 21, 2019, 12:28:56 pmThat PT time does seem a bit unreasonable. Is there any reflections?
Quote from: Rich2 on August 21, 2019, 01:21:26 pmQuote from: WAS on August 21, 2019, 12:28:56 pmThat PT time does seem a bit unreasonable. Is there any reflections?None at all. Anti-aliasing and micropoly set at "reasonable" levels, too.
Quote from: Dune on August 22, 2019, 01:43:05 amPT is really only very good for landscapes with lots of foliage, so I wonder if it's wise to do a barren (nice) scene like this in PT. Why not do a standard render and compare?
Quote from: luvsmuzik on August 22, 2019, 03:55:21 pmI love them both.....what was your multiplier on PT version?
Quote from: Dune on August 23, 2019, 01:56:55 amThe shadows are deeper in the PT version, but the reason why I said about PT versus standard is that not everybody has a fast machine, and sometimes you have to make a time/quality decision. Of course PT is more natural, but using it just because it's possible, may put certain users off due to the lengthy renders. And we don't want that!Btw, with less GI the shadowed rockwall would probably also darken a bit more in a standard render.