Welcome to
Planetside Software Forums
.
Log in
Sign up
Search Forums
Search
Home
Search
Planetside Software Forums
►
General
►
Image Sharing
►
Populations test
Populations test
Started by DannyG, December 17, 2012, 07:01:59 PM
Previous topic
-
Next topic
Print
Go Down
Pages
1
2
User actions
DannyG
1k+ Member
Posts: 1,894
Logged
Populations test
December 17, 2012, 07:01:59 PM
NWDA Lilac, Grasses, reeds, weeds, Spruce, hero rock, Silva3D BlackberryVar3, Pines, Mandrakes Bushes.
First render was at .8 AA10
New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media:
facebook
|
Twitter
|
Instagram
DannyG
1k+ Member
Posts: 1,894
Logged
Re: Populations test
#1
December 17, 2012, 07:04:18 PM
Last Edit
: December 17, 2012, 07:11:08 PM by DannyGordon
Some needed advise from Tangled Universe his recommend settings. Big difference I think, grass is much softer. Bit of a softening to the scene as a whole but still looks good. thanks Martin (Not a huge difference in render time compared to the straight 10)
Detail .8, AA16 (1/16) pixel noise .02 Cubic B-Spline
New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media:
facebook
|
Twitter
|
Instagram
masonspappy
1k+ Member
Posts: 2,466
"Freedom" is telling Mrs Grundy to Go Fly a Kite
Logged
Re: Populations test
#2
December 17, 2012, 07:28:42 PM
it looks very good Danny.
Dune
Fluent in Terragen
Posts: 20,074
Location: Netherlands
Logged
Re: Populations test
#3
December 18, 2012, 02:40:46 AM
Nice setup and I like the veggies. The stones might need some improvement, IMHO. But the main difference I see between the two renders is that the latter is a bit blurred overall. I think if you prefer that, it's quite easy to blur a little in photoshop, but render crisp, so you have the detail. Or do I miss something?
Gallery
DannyG
1k+ Member
Posts: 1,894
Logged
Re: Populations test
#4
December 18, 2012, 05:55:56 AM
Hello Dune, you are correct it is a bit blurry/softened as you mentioned what I didn't like about the original render is the grass looks a bit raspy or harsh. Thats very high res grass I was a bit confused as to why it was looking like that, (maybe some intersecting going on) Martin suggested that I use the above render settings to help this and it did indeed help the grass but it did add some blur to the scene as a whole, I think by using a xero filter or something like that in PH would work, but would seriously the impact the clarity of the atm and trees (more so than above) I appreciate the look and advise, and yes the displacements do look a bit pointy, need to sort that out as well. working on it ^^
New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media:
facebook
|
Twitter
|
Instagram
Henry Blewer
1k+ Member
Posts: 6,332
The cooler weather is great!
Location: Seattle, Washington USA
Logged
Re: Populations test
#5
December 18, 2012, 08:01:52 AM
The Box pixel filter works well also with Martin's settings.
I like both renders actually. Have you tried DOF for your renders? I have not been able to really get that to work...
http://flickr.com/photos/njeneb/
Forget Tuesday; It's just Monday spelled with a T
Dune
Fluent in Terragen
Posts: 20,074
Location: Netherlands
Logged
Re: Populations test
#6
December 18, 2012, 01:10:34 PM
How about the Mitchel-Netravali filter? I use that a lot.
Gallery
Zairyn Arsyn
1k+ Member
Posts: 2,875
I am the naked Coal.
Location: North Florida
Logged
Re: Populations test
#7
December 18, 2012, 02:38:51 PM
very nice scene.
interesting rock displacements.
WARNING! WIZARDS! DO NOT PREDICT THE BEHAVIOR OF OTTERS UNLESS YOU OBEY BIG HAPPY TOES.
i7 2600k 3.4GHZ|G.skill 16GB 1600MHZ|Asus P8P67 EVO|Evga 770GTX 4GB|SB X-FI|Antec 750W
http://zlain81.deviantart.com/
inkydigit
1k+ Member
Posts: 5,189
🍄🍄🍄
Location: Bristol UK / Belfast N.Ireland
Logged
Re: Populations test
#8
December 18, 2012, 06:09:12 PM
Great stuff Danny and some really useful info too...Dune's suggestion sounds interesting too!
J
http://www.inkydigit.net
https://soundcloud.com/idxxiii
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/inkydigit/
http://inkydigit.deviantart.com
DannyG
1k+ Member
Posts: 1,894
Logged
Re: Populations test
#9
December 19, 2012, 12:23:39 PM
Mitchel Netravali Render setting Detail .8 AA16
New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media:
facebook
|
Twitter
|
Instagram
Dune
Fluent in Terragen
Posts: 20,074
Location: Netherlands
Logged
Re: Populations test
#10
December 20, 2012, 02:11:18 AM
I like this better than the very soft one. How about a little population variation among the grass(es)? And I would change the stones/dirt. Smoother, more color variation.
Gallery
TheBadger
1k+ Member
Posts: 7,400
what's the difference?
Location: North of Hell, but not by much.
Logged
Re: Populations test
#11
December 20, 2012, 05:14:18 AM
Good set up. Now drive your self mad tweaking it to perfection.
It has been eaten.
DannyG
1k+ Member
Posts: 1,894
Logged
Re: Populations test
#12
December 20, 2012, 07:22:12 AM
Thanks for the help gentleman, I will work on this this weekend. Sort out the issues Dune mentioned. Thanks again
New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media:
facebook
|
Twitter
|
Instagram
Aerometrex
Member+
Posts: 86
Fabrice
Logged
Re: Populations test
#13
January 02, 2013, 10:46:57 PM
Very impressive result. How long did it take to process?
I am passionate about the art and science of digital aerial mapping, photogrammetry, geospatial information, VR and 3D modelling.
http://aero3dpro.com
choronr
1k+ Member
Posts: 4,574
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Logged
Re: Populations test
#14
January 03, 2013, 02:00:28 AM
Danny, I would suggest you give the stones/rock a more of an earth color (brown/gray). This would better blend with your grasses and plants.
Print
Go Up
Pages
1
2
User actions
Planetside Software Forums
►
General
►
Image Sharing
►
Populations test
User actions
Print