populations - prevent collision on grand scale and distribution

Started by WAS, December 03, 2014, 07:41:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

otakar

Quote from: Oshyan on December 05, 2014, 07:05:01 PM
You want to make sure your test Surface Layer has a coverage of 2 and no Fractal Breakup though.

This made me very curious. Any special reason for a value of 2? I'd think that 1 would do the job by definition (100%). What am I missing?

WAS

Quote from: otakar on December 09, 2014, 01:50:12 PM
Quote from: Oshyan on December 05, 2014, 07:05:01 PM
You want to make sure your test Surface Layer has a coverage of 2 and no Fractal Breakup though.

This made me very curious. Any special reason for a value of 2? I'd think that 1 would do the job by definition (100%). What am I missing?

I think that may just to be sure it's 100% coverage in case of any special layering or something. Dunno. I have noticed sometimes with no density fractal on surface layers, that the coloring isn't 100% with coverage at 1.

Dune

Don't forget that 1 is not a maximum. You can get interesting and often useful results when using higher numbers in colors, density, even negative smoothing, etc.