Wilbur...

Started by aymenk2003, October 24, 2009, 03:45:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Henry Blewer

It looks good at the settings you used. It would probably work very well if animated. Very nice work, but I think TU's settings would really make this pop.
http://flickr.com/photos/njeneb/
Forget Tuesday; It's just Monday spelled with a T

MacGyver

Very good, to my eye the lighting and especially the foreground with the bushes and the tree are exceptionally realistic. Bravo! :D
What you wish to kindle in others must burn within yourself. - Augustine

aymenk2003

Thanks everybody....
I'll try Martin's settings this night ....

N_KAID....
Le peu que je sais, c'est à mon ignorance que je le dois.

Linda McCarthy

My favorite of the three.  Beautiful work!

Quote from: aymenk2003 on December 28, 2009, 02:50:58 AM
Here's a new shot of my render Wilbur...

any comment...
time 3:50
Detail 0.7
AA 4
RTO on  RTE off (as suggested TU _ Martin) btw you were right...
N_KAID...

aymenk2003

AA 6
Detail 0.8
time render 10h12mn
Res 1024x585
RTO on /RTE off
GI 2/2/8
Contrast 0.65 Gamma 2.2
and Still noisy, Martin
Le peu que je sais, c'est à mon ignorance que je le dois.

aymenk2003

That one is Postworked...
Le peu que je sais, c'est à mon ignorance que je le dois.

Tangled-Universe

Hmmm that is a bit of a bummer. If you look critically/carefully you will see that the haze and fine detail in the background really improved with these settings.
Though you can see some improvement in the main tree, there's little improvement in the small bushes.
I think the main reason for this is that they have lots small leafs and since you have increased the resolution slightly you might have also introduced extra leafs to be rendered which sort of counteracted the AA, but that's just pure speculation.

I think this object is a really interesting one for testing the new custom sampling for AA. Perhaps the noise will be less when reducing the noise-threshold.
Which model is it?

Thanks for trying this out, though not the result we hoped for it still gives an interesting result and gives rise to new things to try :)

Martin

Henry Blewer

I think the noise is from the AA trying to figure out how to compute between the foreground branch and the stems and leaves of the bushes. Try changing the bushes leaf color to a darker shade. It could be the bright green which is hard to anti-alias against many colors.

Or change the saturation of the leaves so they are about the same as the saturation of the area they occupy.
http://flickr.com/photos/njeneb/
Forget Tuesday; It's just Monday spelled with a T

Tangled-Universe

Quote from: njeneb on December 29, 2009, 09:55:32 AM
I think the noise is from the AA trying to figure out how to compute between the foreground branch and the stems and leaves of the bushes. Try changing the bushes leaf color to a darker shade. It could be the bright green which is hard to anti-alias against many colors.

Or change the saturation of the leaves so they are about the same as the saturation of the area they occupy.

Ah yes, that sound very logical indeed.
Perhaps that's the first thing to go for.

Oshyan

For investigating the noise issue my first question would be what antialiasing filter you're using.

- Oshyan

aymenk2003

Hi ....
If you mean Pixel filter ...it "Box"

N_KAID
Le peu que je sais, c'est à mon ignorance que je le dois.

Oshyan

Yes, box is a sharper, more "noisy" filter. I'd suggest Mitchel-Netrevali or another option.

- Oshyan

aymenk2003

I usually use Filter Box ...
I'll try this ... Next time mazy with this this render , I'll give it a shot...
thanks Oshyan...

N_KAID
Le peu que je sais, c'est à mon ignorance que je le dois.

EoinArmstrong

Nice bright atmo and colours - yeah it needs a bit more AA, and the grass colour could do with a touch of red in it :)

Linda McCarthy

Ah yes.. The new render is my favorite.  Lovely scene with a great point of view, and I like the vegetation.  Very nice!  Linda