Started by Mohawk20, April 10, 2009, 11:53:52 am
Quote from: Mohawk20 on April 10, 2009, 01:34:54 pmIt's not a frame issue... it's a build issue. Try rendering that first frame in the new gold build, and the last beta build, and tell me what the difference in render time is.
Quote from: Mohawk20 on April 10, 2009, 02:57:18 pmI wonder what kind of pc you have TU... I rendered the first frames in about 30 minutes, and later on that gradually became 50 minutes as the camera gets closer to the planet. But without changing any setting I saved, installed the upgrade, loaded, entered new starting frame number and rendered again. Now all the frames take exactly an hour longer, so almost 2 hours. I re-rendered one of the 'faster' frames, frame 2174 (I upgraded at frame 2176), and it took as long as all the other frames I rendered with the gold version. So forget a frame issue, nothing changed there.It's either a bug in the software (in the '+ Animation' version), or in my pc... the latter is also a good possibility of course So if anyone can render frame 2174 (or a sequence from 2170 to 2180) with both the beta and the gold build and tell me the results, I'd be a step further in solving this.
Quote from: PG on April 10, 2009, 03:36:07 pmDo you have a link to the old beta build? I've got deep + animation.