wideangle vs pan n stitch

Started by cyphyr, April 21, 2014, 05:56:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

cyphyr

Ok this is an old scene but I  keep using it to test ideas out.
It's an evolution of the scene I was working on for the NWDA contest last year.

Here I am looking at lens distortion/correction vs wide angle lens.

The first one is a 100 deg wide angle.
The next two were made of 20 centrally cropped renders with the camera rotating 5 deg per frame. The idea being to remove the lens distortion at the edges of the final image. Not sure it has worked too well.
The second is Auto stitched and cropped in PS
The third is Hand stitched and lens corrected in PS

Which is BEST? Or rather (since that was a silly question) which has more drama/interest?
Oh and I know about the banding, my fault,  I used the wrong GI Padding ...

EDIT .... Forgot to mention, thanks to the guys at http://www.dmi-3d.net/ for the vehicle
www.richardfraservfx.com
https://www.facebook.com/RichardFraserVFX/
/|\

Ryzen 9 5950X OC@4Ghz, 64Gb (TG4 benchmark 4:13)

Kadri

#1

Looks nice Richard.

I think i like the last one the most and the first the less.
The car is too close to the edge in the others .
I would actually try another render where the car is just 10-20 pixel higher
by panning the camera just a little more below or using a slightly different aspect ratio for this to see how that might look.

Dune

I liked the first one most as it's more 'natural', but the other 2 certainly have more impact/movement!

DannyG

New World Digital Art
NwdaGroup.com
Media: facebook|Twitter|Instagram

oldm4n

all are very beautiful; I prefer the 3rd one but I love the sky on the first one, IMHO :)

archonforest

Overall the 3rd one is the best for me. Wide angle looks good but the car is pretty dark there. I would prefer the car from the 1st pix see on the 3rd picture :D
Dell T5500 with Dual Hexa Xeon CPU 3Ghz, 32Gb ram, GTX 1080
Amiga 1200 8Mb ram, 8Gb ssd

j meyer

To my eyes the first image is the most pleasing.
The other two have something to them that makes me feel
rather uncomfy.If I had to choose from those two,I'd prefer
the hand stitched.

otakar

They're different of course, so hard to say which one is 'better' but I would like to see the last one with the same brightness as the first one. Still sad you were not able to complete this scene for the competition, but I am glad you returned to it!

cyphyr

Thanks for the feedback guys.
I would be brightening the rover in post should this be continuing.
My attempts here are to find solutions to the problems of wide angle lens shots and I'm pretty sure these are not the solutions I'm looking for ...
Any other ideas?
www.richardfraservfx.com
https://www.facebook.com/RichardFraserVFX/
/|\

Ryzen 9 5950X OC@4Ghz, 64Gb (TG4 benchmark 4:13)

Kadri


Richard do you want the wide angle lens feeling without distortion or the same wide aspect only?

Darknight

Definitely for more drama, the wide angle lens looks cool. What I like about the first image is that it actually has lens distortion that you would expect from a real camera. Now 100 degrees is roughly equivalent to an 18mm lens I believe on a full frame camera. Try using a 35mm focal length which will be about 63.2 degrees wide. Now move the camera back a little bit to compose the same composition. Try a render and see if you like it.

In my opinion wide angle and lesser wide angle shots have their own unique applications. For vehicles in general, I personally don't prefer extreme wide angles since they distort the shape of the vehicle. But lets say that the vehicle is just a mere addition to a landscape scene and in that case a wide angle look only adds to the story and drama.
I am posting two example photographs to illustrate this.

This image was shot at 20mm on a full frame camera, thats an angle equivalent of 94.48 degrees. Note the distortion but I thought of going with it anyways because the composition is about the milky way and the car, I want both of them in the shot and thats what I am trying show the viewer. So the car is just an addition to the landscape here.


Now this image is more focused on the car and less on the background but I still wanted to convey an urban feel, so some buildings in the background would be nice. The lens used here was a 35mm lens, 63.2 degrees wide.

Hope that helps.  :)
It's not who you are that matters, it's what you do.

TheBadger

really cool. I remember when you first played with this. I like how it finished.
It has been eaten.