Alpine Lake (FINAL)

Started by JimB, November 16, 2009, 05:19:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Oshyan

Quote from: njeneb on November 17, 2009, 07:43:10 AM
We all look forward to the next version. :)

Side Note: Smoother AA filter? I detect a hint of the future. 8)
The AA filter options are already available - Cubic, Mitchell Netravali, etc. ;)

- Oshyan

JimB

Well, I did use Catmull-Rom. You see, someone mentioned the previous one being too soft.....  ;) ;)
Some bits and bobs
The Galileo Fallacy, 'Argumentum ad Galileus':
"They laughed at Galileo. They're laughing at me. Therefore I am the next Galileo."

Nope. Galileo was right for the simpler reason that he was right.

Hannes

Fantastic! Maybe the colour of the rock could be a little darker with a power fractal as colour function.

JimB

Some bits and bobs
The Galileo Fallacy, 'Argumentum ad Galileus':
"They laughed at Galileo. They're laughing at me. Therefore I am the next Galileo."

Nope. Galileo was right for the simpler reason that he was right.

Dune

It's absolutely staggeringly fantastic, and I'm not exaggerating. Great sky now, and the lighting is superb. One question; what did you mean by the now crossed out sentence: The darker lighting towards the bottom of the terain is done using a cloud layer without any noise function, clipped behind the camera (???), inverted profile and a very soft bottom.

---Dune

JimB

#20
I took it out and went with the natural lighting instead, given the lower sun. Clearly it's confusing, so I've deleted that bit from the original post altogether.

Thanks.

Actually, I just thought of something and might re-render with one tweak  ::)
Some bits and bobs
The Galileo Fallacy, 'Argumentum ad Galileus':
"They laughed at Galileo. They're laughing at me. Therefore I am the next Galileo."

Nope. Galileo was right for the simpler reason that he was right.

domdib

Fantastically staggering  ;) I agree that the lighting is superb. Like Dune, I was puzzled what you meant by "clipped behind the camera". Did you push it there with a Distance shader?

FrankB

amazing, Jim. Looks fantastic!

Seth


littlecannon

That is one beautiful image... I see you went with Ryan's suggestion of lighting. Very nice work!
Simon.
I just need to tweak that texture a bit more...

sjefen

There are some strange patterns in the clouds just above the mountains to the right, but other than that it is just spectacular.
Could you do a extra big render of this one?

- Terje
ArtStation: https://www.artstation.com/royalt

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
128 GB RAM
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

JimB

I'm actually re-rendering now with some extra quality settings and a GI change (taking much longer to render, though). So far it's looking much better, so I'm un-finalling the final. I know what you mean about the cloud patterns, but I personally like them. I'll post the 2k version next.

Ta.
Some bits and bobs
The Galileo Fallacy, 'Argumentum ad Galileus':
"They laughed at Galileo. They're laughing at me. Therefore I am the next Galileo."

Nope. Galileo was right for the simpler reason that he was right.

Henry Blewer

How do you improve this one? I'll have to wait and see, but I am very curious...
http://flickr.com/photos/njeneb/
Forget Tuesday; It's just Monday spelled with a T

Oshyan

The update is definitely an improvement, looking very nice, but I find it all a bit underexposed. Granted the sun shining on the mountain is pretty bright, but everything else, including the sky, seems a bit dull or underexposed. Probably something easily fixed in post, especially if you're saving to EXR - maybe a bit of tone mapping. :)

- Oshyan

JimB

#29
Okay, that's definitely it. Done.

Thanks to Ryan for the lower sun suggestion. Also to Matt Howarth for his Mackerel Sky clip file which I modified, but it gave the basis for the cirrhus.
Some bits and bobs
The Galileo Fallacy, 'Argumentum ad Galileus':
"They laughed at Galileo. They're laughing at me. Therefore I am the next Galileo."

Nope. Galileo was right for the simpler reason that he was right.