Dust and Fake Stones (2nd render page 3)

[Seth]

I am working on some dust and fake stones...
i want to have some feedbacks from you guys.

[nvseal]

  This is amazing. The detail is just perfect.

[aymenk2003]

If I m not in the forum now I wiil say that is a real photo...
Good work
(ça me rappel les alentours des chantiers de construction)...

[domdib]

Fantastic realism!

[cyphyr]

Stop posting photographs!!
Richard

[Seth]

thanks ^^

[cyphyr]

Seriously though This is very good but I'd like to see it again without the soft shadows. Soft shadows can add so much "impression" of realism it can be hard to see the work thats gone into the displacement and colours.

Richard

[Naoo]

Hi

I agree with cyphyr post from 04:02:43


ciao
Naoo

[MacGyver]

This is absolutely fantastic, I wish I could give you some tips but seriously it seems perfect to me... and I have to agree, if it wasn't for the fact, that it's on this forum and that some shapes look familiar I would be hard-pressed to say anything but that it is a foto!
Never in my life I would have imagined that dirt can excite me that much

[mhaze]

Brilliant, all it needs are some tyre tracks!

Mick

[Seth]

This is very good but I'd like to see it again without the soft shadows. Soft shadows can add so much "impression" of realism it can be hard to see the work thats gone into the displacement and colours.

errr... you mean you want me to take off some of the tweaks of this render to make it looks worst ?! Oo
I am sorry but i am not sure to really understand... my point in using TG2 is not to make real things but to try to do good looking renders... whatever it takes to fool the eyes of people...
but if i have 10 other hours to lose, i'll do a render without soft shadows.

[FrankB]

kick-ass render, Franck! 

[N810]

2 WORDS...

PHOTO REAL 

[inkydigit]

one word...speechless!!
8-)

[cyphyr]

Hehe, I know what you mean, if only we all had another 10 hours to tweak this and that. No, I only was interested in the simply lit version so I could get a better look at your technique for your displacements and shading. It would almost certainly not be "better" but maybe more informative ...
cyphyr